Tuesday, January 27, 2004
There You Go Again
America is angry with George Bush. At least, that's what the big media guys breathlessly announced last night after John Kerry's win. After all, the people in New Hampshire (and Iowans) say so.
I'm scared to death we're losing the "Antis" war at home, and ultimately, the war on terror Today, I'm discouraged and somewhat disheartened. I'll feel this way until President Bush begins to hit back and Karl Rove gets his strategy figured out. Till then, someone has to start throwing these loathesome prevarications back in their faces. Guess it starts with lil ole me.
Just the facts, Ma'am
Let's talk about that "anger," shall we? First, what in the world are these Antis protesting? This Iraq War remains the most successful war in history, out of which came minimum casualties, the release of 27 million of Saddam's hostages, i.e., his own people, then the shutdown of Iraq's war machines and the capture of Saddam Hussein.
Secondarily, thanks to our presence in Iraq, the world can monitor Iran's nuke build up and possible aggression against other states, Muslim and otherwise. Can there be anyone among serious foreign policy professionals who doubts Iran's motives?
Bush stole the election.. Uh huh. Remember when Nixon won the popular vote, but not the electoral votes against JFK? It happened again. So what? Change the system if you don't like it. A coup? Silly, immature little people.
He's lied to us (along with Tony Blair) about the existence of WMDs. No, he didn't. The president worked off the same information that Senator John Kerry, who sits on the Foreign Intelligence Committee was given and everyone from Kofi Annan to Bill Clinton knew about. How can the allegation that the president lied shape up against such facts?
It was faulty and exagerated intelligence. George Tenet and his CIA people lied and the president knew they were lying. So did the FBI. Wait just a minute! You libs want to play the internal lie card? I'll call that bluff right now. It was Bill Clinton and the left wing of the Democrat Party who managed to gut our intelligence capabilities because, in the strange logic found among the most illogical polity that ever received a charter, G2 expertise was no longer needed in the post Cold War world. In their hopes of turning our world into the Garden of Eden, the serpents among them pulled a hell of a lot of apples off the tree. The Dems can't call this into an intelligence failure unless they take full responsibility for the fact we had not one spy on the ground in Iraq for nearly ten years, therefore setting up the same failures they decry.
And speaking of perpetuating the former adminstration's foreign policy blunders, we must also mention the fact China currently sits a decade ahead of where she would have been if America's nuclear secrets hadn't been sold for votes.
I'm just getting started. Wanna talk about the Balkans? The criteria the Dems use is that despotism and tyranny are only to be preemptively destroyed if a Democrat president proposes to do so. Speaking of terrorists, why didn't Bill Clinton use the prior two or three terror attacks (the U.S.S. Cole and first World Trade Center bombing) as opportunities to shut down Bin Laden? Does anyone truly believe John Kerry will continue Bush's unrelenting anti-terrorist policies and keep us safe? The facts reveal the last Democrat administration wasn't able to handle terrorism. What makes us think any Democrat will in the future? It wasn't in Carter's DNA, nor will it be in John Kerry's. As an example, they're already doing everything in their power to neutralize the Patriot Act, the first line of defense against the creeps in robes.
Oh, you're just a Clinton hater (my favorite). No, I am not a Clinton hater. I strongly disagreed with his policies and personal values. Because of this man, we're in a terrible mess culturally and politically. However, I never had the pathologic hate that is displayed today against the president.
Americans Had Better Figure This Out
Just how disastrous would a Kerry win be in November? Kiss auvoir the U.S.'s resolve to win the war. Slowly, but predictably, the U.S. will capitulate and withdraw, having turned a just and righteous war against terror into another vain and tragic exercise, misunderstood and mischaracterized by history.
Iran might view a Democrat win as proof of an inherent weakness of the American people. The Shi'a in Iraq will hold a gala parade thinking they can finally wrest a minority victory to control the new Iraq. Hammas and their immoral leader, Arafat, will eventually force the region into conflagration as the state of Israel has only so much patience, and must exercise self defense. North Korea will play games again, abandon the multilateral talks that Bush was able to maneuver, successfully scaring the wits out of the new administration and giving an emboldened N.K. a reason to delay talks. This gift of time by the Dems could be the final call to prayer which puts in place the mother of all jihads against America A gift of time to all the tyrants and outlaws in the world who want to kill American citizens in America.
Then there's Pakistan. And Turkey. And all the "Stans" in the south of the old USSR, all holding auctions on their nukes.
If American's haven't figured out what and who's behind the committed and intense struggle the Islamists wage against the U.S., then remain in denial of the very real danger to the lives of our people, we're in for some rough times, both here and there. September 11, 2001 will be only the beginning.
None of the Democrat candidates show he has the guts to lead this nation through the most perilous time of our history. Why would we give them the chance?
Thanks for the read.
I'm scared to death we're losing the "Antis" war at home, and ultimately, the war on terror Today, I'm discouraged and somewhat disheartened. I'll feel this way until President Bush begins to hit back and Karl Rove gets his strategy figured out. Till then, someone has to start throwing these loathesome prevarications back in their faces. Guess it starts with lil ole me.
Just the facts, Ma'am
Let's talk about that "anger," shall we? First, what in the world are these Antis protesting? This Iraq War remains the most successful war in history, out of which came minimum casualties, the release of 27 million of Saddam's hostages, i.e., his own people, then the shutdown of Iraq's war machines and the capture of Saddam Hussein.
Secondarily, thanks to our presence in Iraq, the world can monitor Iran's nuke build up and possible aggression against other states, Muslim and otherwise. Can there be anyone among serious foreign policy professionals who doubts Iran's motives?
Bush stole the election.. Uh huh. Remember when Nixon won the popular vote, but not the electoral votes against JFK? It happened again. So what? Change the system if you don't like it. A coup? Silly, immature little people.
He's lied to us (along with Tony Blair) about the existence of WMDs. No, he didn't. The president worked off the same information that Senator John Kerry, who sits on the Foreign Intelligence Committee was given and everyone from Kofi Annan to Bill Clinton knew about. How can the allegation that the president lied shape up against such facts?
It was faulty and exagerated intelligence. George Tenet and his CIA people lied and the president knew they were lying. So did the FBI. Wait just a minute! You libs want to play the internal lie card? I'll call that bluff right now. It was Bill Clinton and the left wing of the Democrat Party who managed to gut our intelligence capabilities because, in the strange logic found among the most illogical polity that ever received a charter, G2 expertise was no longer needed in the post Cold War world. In their hopes of turning our world into the Garden of Eden, the serpents among them pulled a hell of a lot of apples off the tree. The Dems can't call this into an intelligence failure unless they take full responsibility for the fact we had not one spy on the ground in Iraq for nearly ten years, therefore setting up the same failures they decry.
And speaking of perpetuating the former adminstration's foreign policy blunders, we must also mention the fact China currently sits a decade ahead of where she would have been if America's nuclear secrets hadn't been sold for votes.
I'm just getting started. Wanna talk about the Balkans? The criteria the Dems use is that despotism and tyranny are only to be preemptively destroyed if a Democrat president proposes to do so. Speaking of terrorists, why didn't Bill Clinton use the prior two or three terror attacks (the U.S.S. Cole and first World Trade Center bombing) as opportunities to shut down Bin Laden? Does anyone truly believe John Kerry will continue Bush's unrelenting anti-terrorist policies and keep us safe? The facts reveal the last Democrat administration wasn't able to handle terrorism. What makes us think any Democrat will in the future? It wasn't in Carter's DNA, nor will it be in John Kerry's. As an example, they're already doing everything in their power to neutralize the Patriot Act, the first line of defense against the creeps in robes.
Oh, you're just a Clinton hater (my favorite). No, I am not a Clinton hater. I strongly disagreed with his policies and personal values. Because of this man, we're in a terrible mess culturally and politically. However, I never had the pathologic hate that is displayed today against the president.
Americans Had Better Figure This Out
Just how disastrous would a Kerry win be in November? Kiss auvoir the U.S.'s resolve to win the war. Slowly, but predictably, the U.S. will capitulate and withdraw, having turned a just and righteous war against terror into another vain and tragic exercise, misunderstood and mischaracterized by history.
Iran might view a Democrat win as proof of an inherent weakness of the American people. The Shi'a in Iraq will hold a gala parade thinking they can finally wrest a minority victory to control the new Iraq. Hammas and their immoral leader, Arafat, will eventually force the region into conflagration as the state of Israel has only so much patience, and must exercise self defense. North Korea will play games again, abandon the multilateral talks that Bush was able to maneuver, successfully scaring the wits out of the new administration and giving an emboldened N.K. a reason to delay talks. This gift of time by the Dems could be the final call to prayer which puts in place the mother of all jihads against America A gift of time to all the tyrants and outlaws in the world who want to kill American citizens in America.
Then there's Pakistan. And Turkey. And all the "Stans" in the south of the old USSR, all holding auctions on their nukes.
If American's haven't figured out what and who's behind the committed and intense struggle the Islamists wage against the U.S., then remain in denial of the very real danger to the lives of our people, we're in for some rough times, both here and there. September 11, 2001 will be only the beginning.
None of the Democrat candidates show he has the guts to lead this nation through the most perilous time of our history. Why would we give them the chance?
Thanks for the read.
